My topic is CARE COORDINATION AND THE ESSENTIAL ROLE OF THE NURSE .Directions: Healthcare policy impacts nursing professionals and the broader public. Regardless of where the registered nurse practices, healthcare policy is an important aspect of professional nursing and guides how nurses will practice, “amplifies the views of nursing, and educates consumers and decision makers” (American Nurses Association, n.d.).For this assignment, you will review and analyze one of the ANA Official Position StatementsSelect one of the ANA Official Position Statements and then select one of the subcategories (i.e. position statement: Nursing Practice; subcategory: Delegation) andTurn in your selection to the comments section of this forum for approval. You may want to select two in case your first choice is taken. First selected, first choice.The topic selection is due by week 2. Ask questions if you are unsure!Below are the contents of the paper for the assignment:Identify the topic and the ANA Official PositionCompare and Contrast the position with another federal, national, or global organization on the same or similar position – must show similarities and differencesUsing QSEN Competencies – Describe how the position supports at least one QSEN competency and relevant KSA’sAnalyze the impact of the position on the nursing profession and the broader public – most important section – spend time on this!Discuss how a coach leader would promote this position with novice nurses.The paper is due week 5 in the TurnItIn forum (less than 20% unoriginality) and in the grading forumThis is an APA formatted paper. A template for an APA formatted paper is on the moodle page near the APA references and information. You may use that template, but change the sections that need changing. Use the MEAL acronym for developing your paper.APA requirements for all papers is on the moodle page near the APA references and information.There should be at least references for the position statement, QSEN competency, the comparison organization, and at least two peer-reviewed journals for the analysis section. Do not use .com or .net websites at allReview the rubric that will be used for grading before you turn it in for a grade.IntroductionConstructs well thought introduction clearly preparing reader for contents of paper.10pointsConstructs introduction preparing reader for contents of paper. Main idea clear8pointsConstructs introduction with minimal preparation for contents of paper. Main idea vague7pointsIntroduction disorganized. Main idea vague or missing.3pointsno introduction earns a zero0pointsIdentifies the topic and the ANA official positionWell-stated complete description of the topic and ANA official position10pointsProvides a simple description of the topic and ANA official position with little detail and limited perspective8pointsGood description of the topic and ANA official position with identifiable gaps7pointsDisorganized description with multiple gaps.3pointsno description of topic and ANA position earns a zero (0)0pointsCompares and Contrasts the position with another federal, national, or global organization on the same or similar positionWell-stated, detailed comparison and contrast with other organization on the same or similar position – well discussed with supporting evidence10pointsProvides simple comparison and contrast of the position with another organization.8pointsCompares or contrasts position conveying little understanding of official position and applicability of the organizations.7pointsProvides limited or no description of the chosen indicators; fails to demonstrate understanding of the indicators applicability to the organization.3pointsno comparison and contrast earns a zero0pointsDescribes how the selected position supports at least one QSEN competency and relevant KSA’sWell-stated description is detailed including appropriate competency and KSA; examples given.10pointsDescription is superficial and limited in scope and details of the selected QSEN competency and KSA.8pointsDescription conveys little understanding of the official position and selected QSEN competency and KSA’s.7pointsPoor description of how the selected position supports QSEN competencies.3pointsno description of QSEN and the ANA position earns a zero0pointsAnalyze the impact of the position on the nursing profession and the broader publicRobust analysis of the impact of the position on the nursing profession and broader public – examples15pointsGood analysis with gaps addressing impact of the position on the nursing profession and broader public – examples12pointsSuperficial analysis of impact of the position on the nursing profession and broader public – did not include information; few to no examples10pointsLittle to no analysis of the impact of the position on the nursing profession and the broader public – examples irrelevant5pointsSelection of this criteria is due to plagiarism throughout paper.0pointsDiscuss how a coach leader would promote this position with novice nurses.Provides a complete discussion of the coach leader and promotion of the select position with novice nurses5pointsSuperficial discussion of the coach leader, needs of the noivce nurse, or inclusion of the position4.5pointsDiscussion lacks depth or no inclusion of the coach leader3pointsSelection of this criteria is due to plagiarism throughout paper.0pointsConclusionConstructs well thought conclusion clearly summarizing contents of paper.10pointsConstructs conclusion summarizes contents of paper. Main idea clear.8pointsConstructs conclusion with minimal summary of contents of paper. Main idea vague7pointsConclusion disorganized. Main idea vague or missing.3pointsNo conclusion earns a zero0pointsWriting Mechanics (Spelling/standard Grammar/ organizational flow of thoughts___Provides logical flow of content ___ Assignment is at least checked using word processing spelling and grammar tools ___ Assignment is also checked visually for errors not detected electronically ___ Syntax, grammar, spelling, punctuation, usage, mechanics, organization, and clarity are at the highest level5points___Provides logical flow of content ___ Assignment is at least checked using word processing spelling and grammar tools ___ Few to several issues with writing mechanics4points___Flow of content with gaps. ___ Assignment shows evidence of minimal review for spelling and grammar errors ___ Multiple issues with writing mechanics3points___Flow of content poor. ___ Multiple issues with writing mechanics and no evidence of review1pointsSelection of this criteria is due to plagiarism throughout paper.0pointsAPA Format___ Entire paper is double-spaced with 1″ margins ___ 12 pt font, New Times Roman ___ Correct running head (header) with pagination ___ Title, name, school name centered and double-spaced (please also include course number and title, date and instructor’s name) ___ Length sufficient to properly develop written communication with respect to the main idea, subtopics, etc. (ca. 5-7 or perhaps a few more pages)10points___ Adheres to APA format but lacks 1-2 elements8points___ Adheres to a small number of APA elements6points___ Does not adhere to APA elements 16pointsPlagiarism throughout paper. Earns a zero for the paper0pointsAttribution___ All sources properly attributed, no plagiarism, paraphrasing and direct quotes where appropriate5points___ Sources properly attributed, no plagiarism4points___ Attribution present but significantly incomplete, papers contains plagiarism2points___ No attribution which leads to plagiarism; may result in paper earning zero points0pointsReferences & Citations___ References on separate titled page (centered, bolded) ___ In correct APA format (all information included and appropriate for type of source) ___ Listed alphabetically ___ Hanging indent ___ Each source is cited at least once and all cited sources are included in references ___ All in-text citations complete and correctly applied10points___ References on separate titled page (centered) ___ Not all in correct APA format (all information included and appropriate for type of source) ___ Less than the following (listed alphabetically; hanging indent; minimum of four credible, accurate and appropriate sources; each source is cited at least once and all cited sources are included in references, citations complete and correct)8points___References present but significantly incomplete, unclear or otherwise minimally acceptable5points___ No references for unoriginal work 0 – may result in a zero for the entire paper. Does not turn paper in to TURNITIN or Plagiarism throughout earning zero points for paper.